Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: "Jerk-O-Meter" for EE?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    16,430
    Device(s)
    Snap!!!
    Carrier(s)
    US Cellular
    Feedback Score
    0

    "Jerk-O-Meter" for EE?

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8913900/

    The Associated Press
    Updated: 2:06 p.m. ET Aug. 11, 2005
    CAMBRIDGE, Mass. - Ever wonder if that spouse, friend or co-worker on the other end of the phone is really paying attention? The “Jerk-O-Meter” may hold the answer.

    Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology are developing software for cell phones that would analyze speech patterns and voice tones to rate people — on a scale of 0 to 100 percent — on how engaged they are in a conversation.

    Anmol Madan, who led the project while he pursued a master’s degree at MIT, sees the Jerk-O-Meter as a tool for improving relationships, not ending them. Or it might assist telephone sales and marketing efforts.

    “Think of a situation where you could actually prevent an argument,” he said. “Just having this device can make people more attentive because they know they’re being monitored.”

    The program, which Madan said is nearing completion, uses mathematical algorithms to measure levels of stress and empathy in a person’s voice. It also keeps track of how often someone is speaking.

    “It’s an academically proven thing,” Madan said of the math behind those measurements. “There are a bunch of academic papers published about this.”

    For now, the Jerk-O-Meter is set up to monitor the user’s end of the conversation. If his attention is straying, a message pops up on the phone that warns, “Don’t be a jerk!” or “Be a little nicer now.” A score closer to 100 percent would prompt, “Wow, you’re a smooth talker.”

    However, the Jerk-O-Meter also could be set up to test the voice on the other end of the line. Then it could send the tester such reports as: “This person is acting like a jerk. Do you want to hang up?”

    To test the program, Madan and his MIT colleagues recruited 10 men and 10 women — all strangers to each other — and brought them into the lab. The researchers paired off the test subjects, with men only talking to men and women only talking to women, and monitored 200 three-minute conversations about randomly selected topics.

    After each conversation, the subjects were asked to rate their level of interest on a scale of one to 10. By measuring the speaking style each person had used in the conversation, Madan was able to predict what score they would give roughly 80 percent of the time.

    The study indicated that men and women are interested in conversations for different reasons.

    The subject of the chat was more important to men than women, Madan said. “For the women, it was more dependent on who they were talking to and what the mood was like,” he added. “It wasn’t just about the topic itself.”

    The researchers also tested the technology at a bar in Cambridge where a group of singles were “speed-dating,” rotating through a series of five-minute conversations.

    “Mathematically modeling” each person’s speaking style let the research team predict whether a speed-dater would agree to a real date. It was a good sign, Madan said, if the speed-daters engaged in “back and forth exchanges,” punctuated by “ahas” and “yups.”

    Frank Guenther, a professor of cognitive and neural systems at Boston University, said there are a host of “non-linguistic” cues, such as pregnant pauses, flat pitch levels and slow speech rates, that indicate boredom or disinterest.

    “To me, it sounds like it’s great for the entertainment factor,” he said of the Jerk-O-Meter. “But I don’t think you’ll be able to get definitive measurements. There is just too much variability across individuals.”

    The prototype version of the program runs in Linux on a phone plugged into Voice over Internet service. Once the Jerk-O-Meter is completed, in six months or so, Madan envisions selling it as software that could be downloaded off the Internet — a potentially useful tool for focus groups, telemarketers and salesmen.

    “It sounds pretty cool,” said Jeff Kagan, a telecommunications analyst in Atlanta. “But if someone was using it against me, I’d say, ‘How dare they!”’ he added with a laugh.

    The Jerk-O-Meter is one of many projects at MIT that aim to make cell phones and other communication devices more “socially aware,” said Alex Pentland, director of the Media Lab’s human dynamics research group.

    Madan and Pentland have formed a company, iMetrico, to commercialize some of these technologies for sales and marketing efforts. But it’s too early to say whether the Jerk-O-Meter would be one of them.

    “Almost everybody has a cell phone,” Pentland said. “They’re as powerful as regular computers. There are all sorts of things that can be done with them, but haven’t yet. ... They just don’t support humans the way they live.”

    © 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    If, for some odd reason, Qualcomm picked this one up for BREW I have a feeling it'd not be the best of sellers. Just a feeling, mind
    Quote Originally Posted by PhoenixGeek
    You will never find a more wretched hive of bad spelling and stupidity.
    Come to The Far Side. We have cookies


  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Greenville, NC
    Posts
    9,786
    Device(s)
    iPhone X
    Carrier(s)
    AT&T
    Feedback Score
    0
    This is baaaaaad

    I talk to people all the time who always talk about the same stupid ****. It's an art but I've figured out exactly how to make them think I'm listening when I'm honestly doing something like posting on here. This thing would be smarter than them I'm sure :laughs:

    And now kiddies we know why I spend 4000 minutes a month on the cell phone.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    16,430
    Device(s)
    Snap!!!
    Carrier(s)
    US Cellular
    Feedback Score
    0
    As the article stated, it'd be great for telemarketers and things of that nature. Heck, think of the customer-focused applications it could have in the wireless industry's call centers. IF a company would invest in it, of course. I could see USCC doing this, seeing as it would help to further enhance the company's core values and aims

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Greenville, NC
    Posts
    9,786
    Device(s)
    iPhone X
    Carrier(s)
    AT&T
    Feedback Score
    0
    Now I want to go off about rude and incompetent CSR's (ironically they are never one in the same) but before I start I digress.

    I will say I experienced a little of both today though. At USCC.

    Lance, you need to transfer to Knoxville or whoever takes my calls. And give me your direct line. I'm tired of them screwing up my account for the simplest **** things

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    16,430
    Device(s)
    Snap!!!
    Carrier(s)
    US Cellular
    Feedback Score
    0
    Does Lance have access to MO1? *thinks*

    Actually I know the answer, I'm just curious as to what the gentalman will say himself

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Tulsa, OK, USA
    Posts
    16,062
    Feedback Score
    0
    Fred: No comment.

    Scott: Yes, your calls normally route to Knoxville. Sorry, my house is paid for here, so it'd have to be a pretty big promotion to move to TN.

    Keep the Faith,

    Lance







  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Greenville, NC
    Posts
    9,786
    Device(s)
    iPhone X
    Carrier(s)
    AT&T
    Feedback Score
    0
    The pleasure of taking my calls isn't promotion enough? :laughs:

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    16,430
    Device(s)
    Snap!!!
    Carrier(s)
    US Cellular
    Feedback Score
    0
    *cough*hell*cough*


    LMAO, just kidding man

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Greenville, NC
    Posts
    9,786
    Device(s)
    iPhone X
    Carrier(s)
    AT&T
    Feedback Score
    0
    I hear the jerk-o-meter dinging loud

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    16,430
    Device(s)
    Snap!!!
    Carrier(s)
    US Cellular
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have a habit of doing that

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    1
    Feedback Score
    0
    Seems illogical. First of all, if I can't figure out on my own if someone wants* to communicate with me, then I need to cut them loose. Stat. Notwithstanding, if this was even factual to begin with, who's voice do you suspect would be getting analyzed most of all?

    Oops. Hate when things backfire......

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,392
    Carrier(s)
    AT&T, verizon
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Reneygade View Post
    Seems illogical. First of all, if I can't figure out on my own if someone wants* to communicate with me, then I need to cut them loose. Stat. Notwithstanding, if this was even factual to begin with, who's voice do you suspect would be getting analyzed most of all?

    Oops. Hate when things backfire......
    Way to necro a thread. This is 12 years old.....

Bookmarks