Right. If you aren’t doing anything data intensive you won’t notice a difference usually.
|
|
|
|
|
Type: Posts; User: LTENetwork
Right. If you aren’t doing anything data intensive you won’t notice a difference usually.
I ran speed tests directly. If you are happy with Cricket that is fine. You might as well save money. But if you run actual speed tests on same towers with same device, AT&T Prepaid has faster...
I have used both Cricket and AT&T Prepaid. Cricket is definitely slower than AT&T Prepaid in NYC on speedtests. I am assuming Cricket is QCI 9 prioritization and speeds are throttled. AT&T Prepaid...
Just follow porting directions on AT&T website or call AT&T prepaid if you need assistance. All the info you need is online.
Cricket is always going to be slower than AT&T if you do a side by side by side comparison on any generation of service. AT&T sends a new sim when you order online for a Bring your own device...
Esim is a digital technology and no longer requires a QR code. No store needed. Reps are only trained to upsell, and are mostly clueless on the technology.
