With another Mobile World Congress come and gone it's time to get caught up on other smartphone-related stories of note. Almost two weeks ago
Computerworld took a deep dive into the muddled waters of software updates, grading six Android OEMs on their Oreo OTAs and communication with their customers. To quote the author, such upgrades are basically "
a big, hot mess".
Here's a summary of the report card, ranked from best to worst:
Google: A (94%)
Current flagship upgraded in 9 days (60/60 points)
Previous flagship upgraded in 18 days (29/30 points)
Mediocre communication (5/10 points)
OnePlus: D (65%)
Current flagship upgraded in 138 days (41/60 points)
Previous flagship upgraded in 91 days (24/30 points)
Poor communication (0/10 points)
HTC: F (49%)
Current flagship upgraded in 99 days (47/60 points)
Still waiting for upgrade to previous flagship (0/30 points)
Poor communication (2/10 points)
Motorola: F (45%)
Current flagship upgraded in 124 days (43/60 points)
Still waiting for upgrade to previous flagship (0/30 points)
Poor communication (2/10 points)
LG: F (0%)
Still waiting for upgrade to current flagship (0/60 points)
Still waiting for upgrade to previous flagship (0/30 points)
Poor communication (0/10 points)
Samsung: F (0%)
Still waiting for upgrade to current flagship (0/60 points)
Still waiting for upgrade to previous flagship (0/30 points)
Poor communication (0/10 points)
You can read the whole story at the link below. And feel free to add your own upgrade experience with any OEM not listed here.
Source:
Computerworld
---------
probably an embedded Sierra LTE chip, with either...
probably an embedded Sierra LTE chip, with either eSIM or a sim slot but like the Verizon Novatel T11 very hard to access.
paranoid87 Today, 11:19 AMit has SIM ICCID, phone number so for sure should have a SIM..