• Legal Hurdle Cleared in Class Action Against Apple



    A special episode of The Vergecast this week features an interview with Mark Rifkin, a lawyer involved in a class action suit against Apple. Originally filed in 2011, Apple vs. Pepper argues that the iOS App Store is an unlawful monopoly; whereas Android (for example) offers alternative app stores and direct installs from developers, Apple gives you exactly two choices: deal with the App Store or have zero third-party apps on your phone. Because Apple takes a 30% commission on all App Store purchases, the plaintiffs argue that this fee is passed on to users, who again have nowhere else to go.

    The case has been making its way through the legal system for the past eight years. First, a lower court sided with Apple; then an appeals court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. This week the Supreme Court upheld the prior ruling against Apple, citing the precedent of Illinois Brick, a case where the state of Illinois sued a brick company for price-fixing. Without going into too much detail, that case was about who in the supply chain was the guilty party.

    Here's what Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh says about Apple:

    iPhone owners are not consumers at the bottom of a vertical distribution chain who are attempting to sue manufacturers at the top of the chain. There is no intermediary in the distribution chain between Apple and the consumer. The iPhone owners purchase apps directly from the retailer Apple, who is the alleged antitrust violator. The iPhone owners pay the alleged overcharge directly to Apple.
    In a statement to The Verge Apple asserts that its App Store "is not a monopoly by any metric", and will likely cite the very existence of Android as proof. But, according to Rifkin:

    “The fact that they have a [less than] 50 percent market share of smartphones doesn’t mean they don’t have a 100 percent share of the distribution of iPhone apps—which they absolutely do.”
    Have a listen to the 40-minute episode at the link immediately below.

    Source: The Verge

    ---------
    This article was originally published in forum thread: Legal Hurdle Cleared in Class Action Against Apple started by acurrie View original post
  • Sponsored By

  • Facebook

  • Recent Reviews

  • Recent Forum Posts

    djphilosophy

    I'll counter by suggesting that carrier-tied...

    I'll counter by suggesting that carrier-tied voice and messaging is the past. Phone numbers are the past, though we'll keep them around for awhile because they've become so tied to one's identity...

    djphilosophy Today, 04:49 AM Go to last post
    sharp99

    At that point what's the point of cellular phone?...

    At that point what's the point of cellular phone?

    Sent from my K88 using HoFo mobile app

    sharp99 Today, 04:46 AM Go to last post
    sharp99

    Why are you guys so adverse to a volte/WiFi...

    Why are you guys so adverse to a volte/WiFi calling phones, heck my $40 simple mobile phone had both in 2014. Seems the only way to make VoIP sound remotely modern is to mention phones that don't...

    sharp99 Today, 04:43 AM Go to last post
    AlexKidd1977

    For what it’s worth, it seems like my more recent...

    For what it’s worth, it seems like my more recent speed tests have yielded much better results than those days of 0.5 megabit. I’m on the notorious Go Unlimited de-pri plan - I’m going to hope that...

    AlexKidd1977 Today, 04:42 AM Go to last post
    djphilosophy

    Google Voice / VoIP has the advantage that it...

    Google Voice / VoIP has the advantage that it works on any smartphone (yes, even an old Windows phone with some workarounds) as long as you have a semi-decent data connection, regardless of that...

    djphilosophy Today, 04:37 AM Go to last post