wap.howardforums.com | FAQs | Reviews | About | Rules | Advertise | Contact  
HowardForums: Your Mobile Phone Community & Resource

Go Back   HowardForums: Your Mobile Phone Community & Resource > US Carrier Discussion > ATT.HowardForums.com
User Name
Password
Marketplace Register FAQ Premium Mark Forums Read



Reply
Welcome to the HowardForums: Your Mobile Phone Community & Resource.
HowardForums is discussion board dedicated to mobile phones with over 1,000,000 members and growing!

For your convenience HowardForums is divided into 7 main sections; marketplace, phone manufacturers, carriers, smartphones/PDAs, general phone discussion, buy sell trade and general discussions. Just scroll down to see them!

Only registered members may post questions, contact other members or search our database of over 8 million posts. Why don't you join us today!

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

If you have time check out our sister sites:
HowardChui.com - Where you can find the latest mobile phone news and reviews.
HowardChui.com phone gallery - See interesting pictures of phones that we've taken.
HowardForums Wiki - Our Mobile Phone Encylopedia.
Niknon.com - Our sister site about Digital Photography.
SlowFo.com - General Discussion.
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
TQ5223 TQ5223 is offline

Phone Expert
Phone(s):
1:
2:
3:
Provider(s):

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isriam
i'm also in phx and get 600kbs on average i have never seen over 800. i will talk to the lucent tech's tomorrow and find out what the deal is.


I've so far found the HSDPA network in Dallas to be almost twice as fast on the downlink as the network in Phoenix. However 700kbps download at 120 ms of latency is still quite impressive!!!
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Razor1973's Avatar
Razor1973 Razor1973 is offline

I've climbed a cellphone tower
Phone(s):
1: T-Mobile G1, Nokia E61, E61i, 6682 & 7610 (S60 rocks!), Moto Q9h, Samsung BlackJack II, Treo 750
2: Cingular 8125, Nokia 6170, 6230 & 6800, Siemens S56, Sony-Ericsson T68i
3: Gone: Samsung BlackJack, Cingular 8525 & 2125, Audiovox SMT-5600
Provider(s):
AT&T, T-Mobile (gone),
Joined: Jan 2004
From: Miami, FL, U.S.
Posts: 1,200
You guys are really making me jealous here.

Come on, Cingular! South Florida and Miami in particular are very metropolitan areas with a lot of customers waiting for your response to EVDO... or switching! I wonder what the criteria when choosing those 16 markets was.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
formercanuck's Avatar
formercanuck formercanuck is offline

I have a blue tooth
Phone(s):
1: HTC Tilt
2: Palm Treo 800W
3: Samsung ZX-20
Provider(s):
at&t Sprint
Joined: Feb 2004
From: Los Angeles/Canada
Posts: 7,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by TQ5223
I've so far found the HSDPA network in Dallas to be almost twice as fast on the downlink as the network in Phoenix. However 700kbps download at 120 ms of latency is still quite impressive!!!


I wonder if Cingular is using different links to the Internet from within, or have them set as regional. Only a traceroute from within to a site will tell you.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Isriam Isriam is offline

Drunk
Phone(s):
1: BB 8330 Curve
2:
3:
Provider(s):
Boost Cricket
Joined: Jul 2003
From: CA
Posts: 5,226
Send a message via MSN to Isriam
after doing some research, california and SF are not on lucent UMTS. lucent has portland, seattle, salt lake, phoenix. ericsson i believe is cali market.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
guapoharry's Avatar
guapoharry guapoharry is offline

My antenna is smaller than yours
Phone(s):
1: Cingular 2125
2: i355
3: 6620, 3220, 6010, 3595
Provider(s):
Orange Sherbet with blue and white sprinkles. That's ALLOVER, folks. Yellow - Do, Doing, Done.
Joined: Oct 2005
From: AZ, USA
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by TQ5223
I just did the top three on that page and got within +/- 10%. I'm sure that is worth nothing.

But it is worth something. That's another story. When things correlate like that, it invalidates to some degree the "test is no good for hops outside Cingular's network" claim.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
helpermonkey's Avatar
helpermonkey helpermonkey is offline

I've climbed a cellphone tower
Phone(s):
1: Whatever is not available for sale yet.
2: Treo 650
3:
Provider(s):
Several Cingular Orange 3G SIMs
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,231
I ave been getting consistent results right under a UMTS site of about 120Kb/s upload and 900Kb/sec download. Download speeds have ranged from 600Kb/sec - over 1Mb/sec.

I have two different HSDPA cards currently.

Will try to report back on results using the requested tests when I get a chance.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
helpermonkey's Avatar
helpermonkey helpermonkey is offline

I've climbed a cellphone tower
Phone(s):
1: Whatever is not available for sale yet.
2: Treo 650
3:
Provider(s):
Several Cingular Orange 3G SIMs
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,231
From http://charlestown.speedtest.frontiernet.net/

2006-02-03 09:39:24 EST: 914 / 119
Your download speed : 914 kbps or 114.3 KB/sec.
Your upload speed : 119 kbps or 14.9 KB/sec.

another test
http://www.dslreports.com/stest?loc=97

2006-02-03 09:45:20 EST: 872 / 116
Your download speed : 872 kbps or 109 KB/sec.
Your upload speed : 116 kbps or 14.5 KB/sec.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
CyberMoto CyberMoto is offline

I've climbed a cellphone tower
Phone(s):
1: Moto V2
2: Moto Z9
3:
Provider(s):
ATTWS
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,626
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor1973
You guys are really making me jealous here.

Come on, Cingular! South Florida and Miami in particular are very metropolitan areas with a lot of customers waiting for your response to EVDO... or switching! I wonder what the criteria when choosing those 16 markets was.

FLA was one of the first States with GSM. cingy did not have much GSM until 2004. Looks like we will be one of the last States to get WCDMA. When Verizon launched EVDO in the Tampa area. They did a lot of advertising. cingy has lost a lot of business people to them and Sprint. Since we have 0 3G down here.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
helpermonkey's Avatar
helpermonkey helpermonkey is offline

I've climbed a cellphone tower
Phone(s):
1: Whatever is not available for sale yet.
2: Treo 650
3:
Provider(s):
Several Cingular Orange 3G SIMs
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,231
Results from an FTP test tool - alternately downloading and uploading files of 1000, 2000,3000,4000 and 5000KB in size for a period of time:

Total bytes down = 277,504,000.000
Average down speed= 793.697 kbps
Total bytes up = 276,480,000.000
Average up speed = 121.027 kbps

Signal was -87dBm
Reply With Quote
  #70  
formercanuck's Avatar
formercanuck formercanuck is offline

I have a blue tooth
Phone(s):
1: HTC Tilt
2: Palm Treo 800W
3: Samsung ZX-20
Provider(s):
at&t Sprint
Joined: Feb 2004
From: Los Angeles/Canada
Posts: 7,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by helpermonkey
Results from an FTP test tool - alternately downloading and uploading files of 1000, 2000,3000,4000 and 5000KB in size for a period of time:

Total bytes down = 277,504,000.000
Average down speed= 793.697 kbps
Total bytes up = 276,480,000.000
Average up speed = 121.027 kbps

Signal was -87dBm


Now that's a statistic worth noting!

A decent site in the west to get large FTP files with a decent pipe is from
ftp://mirrors.kernel.org
I had a DS-3 pipe, and downloaded many CD-ROM ISO images of 600+ MB in 3 minutes a piece. The site is in San Jose, and I've typically recieved 25ms respsonse time on DSL from Los Angeles.

It would be interesting to see what the results of a traceroute would show (i.e. where the gateway is, how many hops, etc) for Cingular's network, and how many pop connections there are (assumed 1 per metro).

Code:
1 11 ms 1 ms 2 ms CANADA-JG92XHNB [192.168.254.9] 2 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms 192.168.254.11 3 21 ms 12 ms 11 ms netblock-68-183-96-1.dslextreme.com [68.183.96.1] 4 12 ms 12 ms 12 ms LAX1.CR1.Gig11-0-20.dslextreme.com [66.51.203.1] 5 12 ms 12 ms 12 ms ge-5-1-115.ipcolo1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [63.209.70.133] 6 13 ms 13 ms 13 ms ae-2-56.bbr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [4.68.102.161] 7 24 ms 24 ms 26 ms ae-0-0.bbr1.SanJose1.Level3.net [64.159.1.129] 8 25 ms 24 ms 24 ms ae-11-51.car1.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.68.123.15] 9 25 ms 24 ms 25 ms unknown.Level3.net [209.247.156.222] 10 24 ms 24 ms 25 ms dslreports-west1.speakeasy.net [64.81.79.40]


Code:
1 11 ms 1 ms 1 ms CANADA-JG92XHNB [192.168.254.9] 2 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms 192.168.254.11 3 12 ms 12 ms 11 ms netblock-68-183-96-1.dslextreme.com [68.183.96.1] 4 12 ms 12 ms 12 ms LAX1.CR1.Gig6-0-10.dslextreme.com [66.51.203.17] 5 13 ms 12 ms 12 ms netblock-66-51-206-103.dslextreme.com [66.51.206.103]


vs. an east coast server from Los Angeles - i.e. nac.net

Code:
1 11 ms 1 ms 1 ms CANADA-JG92XHNB [192.168.254.9] 2 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms 192.168.254.11 3 21 ms 11 ms 11 ms netblock-68-183-96-1.dslextreme.com [68.183.96.1] 4 13 ms 12 ms 12 ms LAX1.CR1.Gig11-0-20.dslextreme.com [66.51.203.1] 5 13 ms 13 ms 12 ms ge-5-1-115.ipcolo1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [63.209.70.133] 6 12 ms 12 ms 12 ms ae-13-51.car3.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [4.68.102.14] 7 13 ms 12 ms 13 ms 4.68.111.174 8 77 ms 76 ms 76 ms dsl-bb1-pos7-0-0.telia.net [213.248.80.14] 9 86 ms 86 ms 85 ms nyk-bb2-link.telia.net [213.248.80.10] 10 84 ms 89 ms 84 ms nyk-bb1-pos0-0-0.telia.net [213.248.80.133] 11 85 ms 88 ms 85 ms nyk-b3-link.telia.net [213.248.82.10] 12 83 ms 83 ms 83 ms nac-110814-nyk-b3.c.telia.net [213.248.82.94] 13 85 ms 85 ms 84 ms 11.ge-2-3-0.gbr1.tl9.nac.net [209.123.11.98] 14 118 ms 100 ms 89 ms 0.so-5-0-0.gbr1.mmu.nac.net [209.123.11.53] 15 88 ms 87 ms 88 ms 0.so-2-0-0.gbr2.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.146] 16 87 ms 87 ms 88 ms 0.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.49] 17 91 ms 96 ms * www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175] 18 111 ms * 86 ms www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]

Last edited by formercanuck : 02-04-2006 at 01:46.
Reply With Quote
  #71  
awagner06's Avatar
awagner06 awagner06 is offline

Phone Collector
Phone(s):
1: Apple iPhone 3G 8GB
2: Blackberry Bold
3: Backup- Motorola V9x
Provider(s):
The big blue globe
Joined: Dec 2005
From: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 130
I hope i'm not off topic here but I have a few questions about the 3G network. First off I was wondering what the difference between UMTS and HSDPA. Also, in areas where Cingular has the new network rolled out are you able to place voice calls on the new technology if you have a 3G compatible phone and SIM. And finally, I just purchased the Sierra Wireless Aircard 360 and notice that on the bottom it says "Qualcomm 3G CDMA", does this mean that Cingulars new 3G network is based on CDMA technology (as I thought that it was a 3G of GSM.) Thanks for any insight anyone might have
Reply With Quote
  #72  
CyberMoto CyberMoto is offline

I've climbed a cellphone tower
Phone(s):
1: Moto V2
2: Moto Z9
3:
Provider(s):
ATTWS
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,626
Cool

No WCDMA HSDPA 3.5G.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
helpermonkey's Avatar
helpermonkey helpermonkey is offline

I've climbed a cellphone tower
Phone(s):
1: Whatever is not available for sale yet.
2: Treo 650
3:
Provider(s):
Several Cingular Orange 3G SIMs
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by awagner06
I hope i'm not off topic here but I have a few questions about the 3G network. First off I was wondering what the difference between UMTS and HSDPA. Also, in areas where Cingular has the new network rolled out are you able to place voice calls on the new technology if you have a 3G compatible phone and SIM. And finally, I just purchased the Sierra Wireless Aircard 360 and notice that on the bottom it says "Qualcomm 3G CDMA", does this mean that Cingulars new 3G network is based on CDMA technology (as I thought that it was a 3G of GSM.) Thanks for any insight anyone might have


HSDPA stands for High Speed Downlink Packet Access and is a new feature of UMTS (under the R5 or release 5 UMTS standard) allowing for faster downlink data speeds. It is similar to the way EDGE was a way of speeding up GPRS data speeds.

Cingular will offer voice devices, but currently do not believe any have been approved for sale. Voice is functional on UMTS, but I am not sure that it would be fully functional on all current UMTS networks.

UMTS is a CDMA technology. It is different from the 3G version of CDMA that Verizon and Sprint are using in many ways. UMTS is backwards compatible with GSM as it was developed by the same standards group (3GPP).

From the 3GPP website:
"The original scope of 3GPP was to produce globally applicable Technical Specifications and Technical Reports for a 3rd Generation Mobile System based on evolved GSM core networks and the radio access technologies that they support (i.e., Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA) both Frequency Division Duplex (FDD) and Time Division Duplex (TDD) modes). The scope was subsequently amended to include the maintenance and development of the Global System for Mobile communication (GSM) Technical Specifications and Technical Reports including evolved radio access technologies (e.g. General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) and Enhanced Data rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE))."

Maybe that helps with some fo your questions.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
samab samab is offline

I've got more phones than fingers
Phone(s):
1: Samsung A540
2:
3:
Provider(s):

Joined: Jun 2003
From: Toronto
Posts: 4,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by awagner06
I hope i'm not off topic here but I have a few questions about the 3G network. First off I was wondering what the difference between UMTS and HSDPA. Also, in areas where Cingular has the new network rolled out are you able to place voice calls on the new technology if you have a 3G compatible phone and SIM. And finally, I just purchased the Sierra Wireless Aircard 360 and notice that on the bottom it says "Qualcomm 3G CDMA", does this mean that Cingulars new 3G network is based on CDMA technology (as I thought that it was a 3G of GSM.) Thanks for any insight anyone might have


It just means that Sierra Wireless Aircard 860 uses silicon chips supplied by Qualcomm.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
TQ5223 TQ5223 is offline

Phone Expert
Phone(s):
1:
2:
3:
Provider(s):

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 74
Here is a test from downtown Washington, DC at -68 dBm

2006-02-06 19:06:21 EST: 1076 / 82
Your download speed : 1076 kbps or 134.5 KB/sec.
Your upload speed : 82 kbps or 10.3 KB/sec.

H:\>ping www.yahoo.com

Pinging www.yahoo.akadns.net [68.142.226.35] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 68.142.226.35: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=54
Reply from 68.142.226.35: bytes=32 time=133ms TTL=54
Reply from 68.142.226.35: bytes=32 time=131ms TTL=54
Reply from 68.142.226.35: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 68.142.226.35:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 129ms, Maximum = 133ms, Average = 130ms
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Current time is 16:47 GMT.


Niknon.com | HowardChui.com | wap.HowardForums.com | wiki.HowardForums.com | SlowFo.com